The age of the internet might give some the illusion that with it comes new freedoms, infinite variety that enriches all our experience. The evidence, however, suggests that those who were first to establish niche sites or had the financial clout to establish a stranglehold monopoly at the cost of variety or choice, are both growing in power and slowly subsuming the smaller players until we the consumer find ourselves buying from fewer and fewer sources. IMDB is far and away the biggest and best movie/tv site. The income it once felt needed to come from those in the movie industry ( a digital ‘Spotlight’ for casting directors ) is now as nothing to its income from advertisers. The Biblical status of IMDB to movie lovers, suggests to me that the users whose presence gives it value, deserve some payback as does the history and cultural status of the industry it ‘serves’. Do IMDB genuinely expect the ancestors of actors to pay for the empty portrait frames to be filled, those performers whose images are slowly decaying in forgotten vaults will completely vanish from the memories of the few that remember them. The digital stream of consciousness should have no blanks because the perceived ‘profit’ makes a page of empty portraits seem acceptable.Please take some pride in your importance as a data base fill in the gaps.If anybody ever reads this verbose and opinionated rant I will be very surprised but late night platforms are a temptation to Coca fuelled bores who ‘tweet’, ‘Facebook’ and publish because they can. I could be watching Sinatra in ‘Man with the Golden Arm’, following fashion, learning what’s ‘cool’ , kid, straight from the horses mouth! Not the dead horse, of course, the ... I once saw a kid with a white t shirt, Levi 501’s , Ray Ban sunglasses , zippo lighter, cigarettes. It could have been me.Who says they haven’t been moulded by the image makers. Albrecht Jünker. 2019.