iSaveWeb Pro 17+

It is good but it can and should be much better!!!

Let me say firts that this app is better from Instapaper: it is much clearer from instapaper and much more frendly-user.
I also like the idea to save the page identically to the original (images and other stuff).

However I don't see a reason to buy the pro version.
What you pay for is only the "multiple pages (3 levels of depth)" and honestly saying it is useless.

I waited couple hours to download the newsweek.pl and many other sites on the 3-rd depth.
So what's the point of that? In the meantime the news you download are not so fresh anymore!

But still if you waste a time to download it all it would take much much more time when you just read some of
the articles you like to when you have the internet connection.
And even in the level of 1st depth it is still very long.
And what's the point of waiting that long?

It could work good if they just give option to choose in multiple page like "text only" - just to save raw text with links to other raw text.
It would save much more time because one of the reason why it takes that long is because it has to download
and save ALL the images and picters you don't really need.
All that works great with just the single page because it takes like 10-15 sec to save the page with all the pictures.
And that's what I am talking about!

The thing that I miss the most is to have automated updates of the pages you choose.
Each time you want to see a new page you have to go to safari and then add with the bookmark to save page in isave web!
Why that much? Why not to have links you read every day in isave web?
Let's say you walk in area you have internet. Then the isave web updates the page you have in your bookmark automatically!
Like the home page of newsweek.pl that is different everyday.
That's the second thing I miss. It doesn't work when it is closed. It has to be open to download sites...

Overall it is handy application but only in free version!