There is a difference between trying to add excitement to a fight to get people to watch and blatantly lying. Length of career does not automatically correlate to quality. There is nothing “remarkable” “illustrious” or “top-tier” about Ronny Gabel. He has ONE win against a guy who has won even 60% of his fights and he scraped by him on the cards. He has 4 wins against guys with more wins than losses and almost every opponent currently has between 1 and 3 more wins than losses. There is nothing memorable about him and his only fights anyone might rewatch will be a couple of his losses.
Hi Lester. Thank you for sharing your perspective on Ronny Gabel and the way we present fighters in our app. We understand that excitement and enthusiasm are key elements of sports promotion, but we also recognize the importance of providing accurate and honest information about fighters' careers and abilities.While Ronny Gabel may not be a household name globally, he has been a notable figure in the European boxing scene since his debut in 2007, particularly in Germany. We acknowledge that his career record and the quality of his opponents are points of contention among fight fans. Our intent in using terms like “remarkable,” “illustrious,” and “top-tier” was to capture the enthusiasm and support he has garnered in certain circles, rather than to misrepresent his achievements.We appreciate your feedback as it helps us maintain a balance between adding excitement and being factually accurate in our representations. It's important for us to respect the varied opinions of our diverse user base, and we'll certainly take your comments into consideration for future content.We also value the in-depth analysis that seasoned fans like you bring to the table. It enriches the community's understanding of the sport and the fighters. If you have any further insights or suggestions on how we can improve our content, please feel free to reach out. Your input is crucial in helping us serve all boxing enthusiasts better.