Google Gemini 12+

I recreationally use Gemini for its image generation as I have found it to generally create accurate and well-made images based on my descriptions. It does a good job of incorporating any of my stated details into the image, and the fact that it is free is a major plus. There is a limit on how many images you can generate which is unfortunate, but I’m still able to create dozens of images per day. If they had a subscription option to enable unlimited images for a reasonable price, I would gladly pay for it.

The AI chat feature is impressive too, but I find that ChatGPT is slightly more comprehensive in that regard. It’s still serviceable though and I hear it can be used in conjunction with certain other Google Apps, which is an interesting feature.

Overall, I am pleased with Google’s foray into the AI space and I see a lot of potential for this program. In the time I’ve used it, the image generation has improved, so I can only imagine the further improvements they will make in the years to come. I implore you to embrace the future and to appreciate the positive impact that can be made through the responsible use of AI.

The reason I gave four stars out of five is because it cannot generate pictures very well and sometimes if you do get anything that’s generated from it. It has misspelled words or letters that are halfway there like it doesn’t know the alphabet. Also, I can’t listen for certain noise even if you explain to it what it is and generate actual answers on what those sounds might be like if you have a ticking noise coming from a vehicle, it won’t hear that. Certain little kinks like that is why I gave it four stars instead of five if they could update that and incorporate away for it to understand and search for things like that, it would be a five star app without a doubt. I am being highly critical though, so other users might think that it’s a five star app. But just as of my critical opinion, that would be what was needed for me to say it’s a five star app. But for other things, it is super useful. For theoretical concepts and understanding, it goes far beyond anything else or any other kind of service I could think of. Like I think even the app itself knows of its own flaws and it’s kind of weird that it would know something like that. And if you was to compare it to something like Siri, I would rate it 100 stars compared to series 5 or five stars compared to series one whichever way you wanna go about it. Either way it is much more useful. I just think it could be better.

It can talk over me a little and be quick but it’s a gem gem-ini lol I have more conditions for the structural engineering standards delivered on its data framing output. how it can manage my own inputs that will help me not have to even touch my calendar or anything I can’t even get setup consistently to be under control. That’s not my job to read different IOS settings I need to go play in sand through like a hooper over and over. Build up your game Gemini, and tell us in confidence we think it’s best to meet at a specific time and make sure the AI marked a google clock that will make us look at 4 page keynote on simple actionable results listing 3 goals met from previous time clock we set as actionable goals. And one page for 3 key parameters that may bring yourself together with refreshing initiative idea, that are to review your debrief of what I can use plan transitioning into a full course of routine work for my council members and client groups onsite prem . We start the conversation it should begin with personal connection with each other briefly build rapport and move into a T/F question regarding the first word that user is processing under high levels of load resistance someday in life