Manus AI 12+

I have created many different types of applications using open source and paid server AI-models and I concluded that people with no experience in coding would need to devote a large amount of time to learn to how to structure the prompt just build the applications correctly and seamlessly let alone understand the core concepts. Manus AI has been the best experience compared to any application because it works with you by asking questions and altering the application environment without having to deal with an incorrect prompt that will get overridden the next question you ask. Great job at Manus AI, can’t recommend it enough.

The app is a good start to be able to accomplish what you need. There are definitely some things missing right now like the ability to set preferences like your start screen, for example. The way “Knowledge” works also isn’t really clear by the UX; I didn’t realize it was asking me these things to be able to set presences for future jobs. If so, there would need to be a flow asking me what knowledge I want to apply to a job and/or a way to categorize Knowledge given that some knowledge I define may apply in some situations but I wouldn’t want it applied in others. Another major thing it could use are Projects where you could define or ideally transfer context and related data to for new sessions. Given these sessions can get huge, there is a good chance you may need to start over so why not make this easier. So, there is work to do on the overall UX and app as a whole. Although the AI is not what I’m reviewing it too needs work but is far ahead of anything else out there. I am sure most of these reviews focus on that but if you want to know if the app is any good; it’s ok. The service is differentiating and ahead of others right now as a solution but not necessarily in any specific way that it executes; but that is another story. It’s great to see this put together to encourage the industry to innovate regardless. Congrats to the team!

Manus has some strong features allowing for most responses to be shared accurately based on how it functions versus its competitors.

Advantages:
1. Simple to use prompts appear to be a major advantage.
2 urls are scanned for updated information in near real-time providing accurate results

3. Prompts and suggested clarifications allow for improved clarifications, and fine tuning of results. Turning interactions into a conversational state when querying results.

4. Accurate data curation provide masterful results.

Cons:
1. New credit feature is expensive A single question could use up all your credits for a month! This needs major improvements.
2. prompt generation for website coding did not produce a working product during multiple tests, Tweaking was required. Did not follow frameworks completely.
3. Response time, several responses during testing ran over 20 minutes and were not completed wasting credits without a response being completed.

Overall: Insanely strong capabilities exist for this product as it evolves, the usage has been amazingly simple to follow, offers historical results and is highly improved as long as costs are not an issue.

So far this product has been a great example of how AI should function. This product is still my favorite tool and will only get better with time. A+ product!