Five stars means money
This is a favor I’m doing for this company, give them five stars. In truth it would be 3.5 instead of a 5. Why? The usability of the program is still a bit clunky. I must say however there is a massive potential waiting to be unleashed and if handled properly will give the established cad company a good run for their money. Speaking from an architectural point of view drawing objects like walls needs to be more streamlined with much less steps. What would be a big plus is if you could easily assign a dimension as you draw. Another great feature if they could get it to work would be to define an object and give the user the ability to stamp the object at will on the drawing. There is something presently, but it is a bit cumbersome to get to.
On a whole this program is really not bad, I like it a lot and would encourage design aspirants to check it out for themselves. And by the way asking someone for a five star rating is unsavory and a bit distasteful in my book. Your rating should be organically derived on the basis of merit. Ok so maybe I could honestly give them a 4 instead of a 3.5. Apart from the versatility of the product the price / value ratio is extraordinary high.
Go ahead and give them a shot. I’m already convinced.