Overall, a very good app to prepare for the AFOQT. The knowledge review is very thorough and easy to follow on the iPad. There are however quite a few of the practice test questions that have the incorrect answer listed as the correct answer. Not an overwhelming amount, but a few. Still very worth your time to take the practice tests. One thing that could be improved though is the test bank in general. Although the questions in the test bank are challenging and good review, I noticed once taking Barron practice tests that some of the Arithmetic Reasoning questions in this app were a little easier and faster to solve. I would consider expanding the test bank with some of the prep books as a template. Also, the Word Knowledge answer options make it very easy to eliminate the incorrect answers on every question, which doesn’t accurately reflect the test or other test prep books. Some questions may do that, but not all. Again, still good practice, but I was able to work through the section at a much faster pace than other practice tests because of it. Overall, would recommend.

Probably the best app and totally worth the $15. I had a quick turn around for my second test and used this app for about two weeks. After going over multiple tests there have been some answers in the app that were incorrect though. This was annoying because it didn’t give me an accurate test score or guage for the practice tests. However, that is the only complaint, and with the explanations following the test this made up for it, as I could see the process of the problem.Post Test Update: Overall I did spectacular on the test Pilot: 64, CSO: 66, ABM: 50, Acad: 53, Verbal 92, Quantitative: 31. The only portion I didn’t study from was the science section. My three rated areas went up 20-40 points overall after using this app! On the aviation information section there was some new information in the test that I didn’t see in the app however. But, overall A+ !

This app is by far the greatest AFOQT study tool. I would argue it is better than the study books. I had already taken the AFOQT and needed to bump up my pilot score. I spent several hours on this app reading through all the sections necessary, and I took the practice tests multiple times. After a while it got fun because you can see how you are progressing through each of the sections. Also, with this app, you can study whenever you have a few minutes of down time which really adds up. This app significantly helped me study and after taking the AFOQT for the second time my pilot score went from a 59 to a 99!! I highly recommend this to any cadet studying for the AFOQT.

Have enjoyed using this app to study and prepare for the test thus far, but this particular section gave me pause due to the slightly confusing and misleading review section. If someone was using this app as a sole study guide, this could hurt their chances. So I felt compelled to reach out. In the heat transfer and matter phase changes section- 3 things seemed a bit off. 1. One of the question asks for an example of radiating heat, and the correct answer is a “campfire in a vacuum” and not an electric heated baseboard, which was a different option. Ignoring the fact that a campfire, or any fire, cannot exist in a vacuum, wouldn’t electromagnetically generated ambient heat be a slightly better example? Considering it would generate heat without air… whereas a campfire literally could not?2. Answer to liquid-solid question is solidification, but is is not mentioned in the review text, only the term freezing, so I think this should be updated.3. The last question asks for an example of conduction. The text explicitly uses the boiling of water on a stove as an example of conduction. This is an option for answers in the review, but is somehow incorrect. “Ice melting in your hand” is the correct answer. I can see an argument that TECHNICALLY it is a better example as the heat generated by the hands is conducted to the ice, whereas the heat is not generated directly into the water to boil it, but rather the pot, but it is still very much conduction. Normally this wouldn’t bug me, and it’s the first number of errors I’ve found so far, but I feel like if I was trying to use this app to learn this information for the first time or review it better, then this would do more harm than good. Hope this helps! Great app and super easy to use otherwise!