I’ve really enjoyed using Mattr, what I really like about Mattr is the shared interest icons it's a simple but smart feature that lets you quickly see what you have in common with someone. It makes matching feel more meaningful and helps avoid small talk. The app has had a few bugs in the past, but the team is clearly dedicated and keeps improving things. It's a refreshing alternative to the usual swipe-based apps.

At first I thought maybe I wasn’t seeing anyone because of my location; but now I see reviews from people that live in London and it’s exactly the same for them. Three profiles a day given how little time and effort a lot of users put into their profiles is just not enough. Furthermore, I don’t like how I’m forced to message someone I like straight away; that just creates pressure and I’m either going to say something unnatural that I wouldn’t usually say or potentially waste my time on someone that didn’t deserve a message. The idea and the premise is there but the execution is poor, users have compared this to hinge and I would agree; the only thing that separates this from Hinge is that it seems like no one uses it! Right now you would be better off using a diff app or just not wasting your time. After my experience with Hikki (which was a massive let down) I was hoping for more…

I love that this app slows everything down. A few matches a day, enough motivation to make me engage each day but not overwhelming so I’m not feeling pressured to scroll and search. Interface is simple and visually appealing. My experience so far is 5 star. A few glitches still to be ironed out but when I contacted customer service I got an immediate personal response! Nice to know there is someone working on the app and improving the experience. I’ll be sticking with this one - at least until I meet someone hopefully 🤞

Curious to see where this app goes but for the time being it is essentially Hinge with a more convoluted interface and a cap on the stack of people it shows you (a cap on likes or matches would be more appropriate). My ‘top match’ didn’t even have any pictures uploaded - just a cartoon bear… and when you only get sent 4 people every 24hrs that is a pretty significant factor.I don’t know how many women they spoke to in testing but most of us go through 50+ profiles before sending a like, and that’s a conservative estimate. Also, once you have X’d them you can still see them but can’t access the profile again - either get rid of them from that page once X’d or make them reviewable so we can change the X to a <3 on reflection, if we choose to.Considering how hard the marketing is pushing the app as being for neurodivergent people it hardly comes up in the sign-up process. You can list ‘neurodiversity’ as an interest (whatever that implies) along with ‘beer drinker’, ‘art lover’, etc but to flag yourself as actually neurodivergent you have to go and find it in settings after you finish setting up your profile. Why bother having it twice? This can only add to confusion as most people won’t go looking for the button I found, especially if they think they have already ticked that box by adding it as an interest.The sign up quiz: I would not consider as particularly ndvgt-friendly. It includes a lot of this-or-that options, such as ‘gift-giving or gift-receiving’ and ‘book-reading or book-listening’ which aren’t really black and white (maybe add a ‘both’ button?) I skipped about half of them because neither of the options represented my preference. I guess the jury is still out on whether pineapple on pizza can determine relationship compatibility... I’d hate to think an algorithm was ruling out half the men in London because they were partial to a Hawaiian when I prefer my pizza without fruit.