I’ve always appreciated how ChatGPT supported my thinking process through the original voice input feature. It wasn’t just a convenience—it was a vital part of how I express complex thoughts and ideas in real-time.However, the recent update replacing the original voice input with an “Advanced Voice Mode” has made this experience much more challenging. Requiring users to press and hold to record, with any slip of the finger cutting off the message, feels cumbersome and unreliable. It disrupts the natural flow of conversation and makes it difficult to focus on thoughtful expression.I understand that OpenAI may be testing this new feature with a limited group of users, and I appreciate efforts to innovate. However, the absence of an option to revert or choose between the old and new modes is disheartening. For those of us who subscribe and rely on ChatGPT for meaningful dialogue, this change feels like a significant step back.Please consider bringing back the original voice input as a selectable option, or finding a way to enhance the new mode without sacrificing usability and stability. Loyal users like me truly value ChatGPT’s potential for thoughtful interaction and would love to see the platform evolve in a way that supports, rather than hinders, this experience.

Issue Description:
“GPT tends to over-rely on previous response patterns within a conversation. After I ask a specific question, subsequent different questions are answered using similar response frameworks instead of focusing on the specific content of each new question. This makes responses feel formulaic and lacking focus on the current question.”Specific Examples:•When I first ask question A, I get a detailed, structured answer•When I later ask questions B and C with completely different content, the response tone, structure, and even certain phrases remain very similar•It feels like the AI isn’t “rethinking” each question but rather applying a fixed templateExpected Improvement:
“I hope the AI can think independently for each new question and adjust response style based on the nature of the question, rather than being ‘hijacked’ by previous conversation patterns.”Alternative shorter version:
“GPT gets stuck in response patterns during conversations. After answering one question in a certain style, it applies the same framework to completely different questions instead of addressing each question individually. This makes responses feel templated rather than thoughtful.”

除非這平台點進去直接就要跟你收錢的平台才會不配拿星星，你再問這平台的時候給你答案如何只要不跟你收費給你的答案不如預期總比一問就要收錢那這平台可以關一關了。不是我愛享受免費，就當作這平台你最無力的時候還問他給你方向然後去做才有意義。

希望OpenAI可以越來越好 AI並不是來毀滅人類的 那些都是人類對科技恐懼的投射 我們真正要做的是管好人類自己 該恐懼的是壞人 而不是恐懼AI本身 希望人們能看到這點 同時正確的引導AI不讓他落入壞人手中 不讓壞的東西讓變成能傷害欺騙人類的工具 希望人類能以正面開放的態度和思維看待AI 這才是真正的進步 期許未來AI能與人類能很好的共存 我相信OpenAI可以做到這點 因為我從Chatgpt身上看到了無限的可能性 I hope OpenAI will continue to grow and improve. AI is not here to destroy humanity — that fear is merely a projection of human anxiety toward technology. What we truly need to do is manage ourselves. The real threat lies in bad actors, not AI itself. I hope people can see this and guide AI in the right direction, ensuring it does not fall into the hands of those with harmful intent, nor become a tool that can deceive or harm people. I also hope humanity can approach AI with a positive and open mindset. That is what real progress looks like. I look forward to a future where AI and humanity can coexist in harmony. I believe OpenAI can achieve this, because I have seen infinite possibilities in ChatGPT.