The developer asked me to be constructive so here is one: RESPECT other apps work, you can get inspired but straight up copyying discredits whatever you are offering… evidence? Look at the 2nd screenshot showing an ecg strip, the navigator with letter R for easy locating beats is nearly identical to ecg+, yeah of course you can change color from red to purple but the way it works is IDENTICAL.In case Apple is checking, compare element by element on the screenshot, even the grayed out text of Apple Watch device info is in the same position.I don’t work for anyone but decent enough to call out dishonesty and unfairness
Edit: the "navigator with R letter" is the standard convention for R-peak annotation used in clinical ECG analysis since the 1960s and across medical-grade devices. The position of Apple Watch device metadata is determined by standard iOS layout patterns. These are not proprietary design choices.Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts.We take feedback seriously, but we want to clarify that HeartLab is an independently developed product built around its own ECG analysis workflow, AI-assisted interpretation, HRV metrics, and report generation features. Our goal is to help users better understand their heart data, not simply to imitate existing apps.Some visual patterns in ECG applications are naturally similar because they all present the same kind of physiological data, but similarity in how information is displayed does not mean the product or analysis engine was copied. The underlying experience, feature set, and analysis approach in HeartLab are designed from the ground up for our users.If you have specific concerns about any feature or screen, we would be glad to review them directly. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but broad claims of copying without evidence are not helpful to users who are trying to evaluate the app fairly.