I really enjoy this game when I want to play a quick game of chess and not blitz. I stop playing after the reviews are blocked. It would be cool if I could watch an ad to review or something. I also hope you add an endgame mode. That’s what I need to work on the most. The membership price is a little high, but I’d pay a couple bucks to keep my reviews going on. Maybe a couple more if there a family plan option. Oh! And an AI explanation during the game review would be nice. (I think the membership would be worth it then.) I’d like to know why my move wasn’t the best move, or why the recommended move was.

I've been using the app since it came out three months ago. It has been very good up until about two or three weeks ago. Now the starting positions look like a five-year-old randomly set up pieces on the chess group. Even though the materials balanced one side has a complete advantage always. After reviewing the positions currently versus when the at first came out two 1400 level we're playing a position/puzzle that was maybe 500 points above them were things were somewhat confusing, but easier to navigate now the position is even though it's equal by stockfish the puzzles at a grand master level. That's great if you have time to figure out the position by this time control. The position should be no more than a 3 to 400 points higher than the people playing it. This is a serious flaw

This is a fun game with an interesting concept, the issue lies in that the game can be “anti-tactic”. Say you trade pieces and will be equal after forking the king, at one point you’ll be down 2 points, and the game ends. I like the fast pace play, and starting in the middle game. I think you should add a second game mode where it starts you in the middle game but you play till the end of the time. Overall fun game, some odd quirks, but excited to see how it will develop!

You must play five times to play once… just unacceptably bad. More than once has timed me out of a checkmate when I played immediately. Can’t recommend.As I play more, I encounter more imbalanced starting positions, sometimes gifting white an immediate free piece or putting black under immediate threat where one wrong move ends the game. Once I won with my first move and I don’t believe there was an effective counter; my lead was deemed stable after just two moves total. I wonder if there is even a rigor to creating the starting positions, or if they are generating them with AI. I’ll finish my trial and then delete and I recommend you do the same. Too many negatives and annoyances despite the interesting premise.