Human Dx

Name: Human Dx
Rating: 4.8 (602 reviews)
Author: Human Dx, Ltd.

Collective AI + expert answers

Free · Designed for iPad

602 Ratings
Age Rating

16+
Years
Category

Reference
Developer

Human Dx, Ltd.
Language

EN
English
Size

76.6
MB

Use a transformative system that combines multiple top AIs (including Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, and Perplexity) with expertise from members of our community in a seamlessly integrated experience. Recent research funded by the European Union demonstrates that collective human and machine intelligence substantially outperforms even the best individual experts or AI models like ChatGPT.

Ratings & Reviews

4.8

out of 5

602 Ratings

Paramedic friendly!
07/31/2021

EmmyBadger
I am prepping for my NREMT-P exam this fall. I heard about this app on a medical podcast I listen to in the car. I have this set to Emergency Medicine and it had not disappointed. It has been an awesome game to play when I have a few minutes in between activities. I LOVE how the docs have full descriptions on the entire case once you complete it. They walk you through everything. Thank you SO much! Im telling all my Philly medic friends, Jefferson instructors and students about this amazing resource!
Paramedic friendly!
07/31/2021

EmmyBadger

I am prepping for my NREMT-P exam this fall. I heard about this app on a medical podcast I listen to in the car. I have this set to Emergency Medicine and it had not disappointed. It has been an awesome game to play when I have a few minutes in between activities. I LOVE how the docs have full descriptions on the entire case once you complete it. They walk you through everything. Thank you SO much! Im telling all my Philly medic friends, Jefferson instructors and students about this amazing resource!
Excellent concept, but onboarding gap undermines learning
Apr 30

Resideo-007
I like the core idea of this app—case-based diagnostic reasoning is exactly what trainees need. However, there is a critical issue with how scoring is presented versus how users are instructed.There is no upfront explanation of how answers are graded. As a result, I initially approached cases by building a broad differential (which is a valid clinical strategy), assuming that having the correct diagnosis included would be sufficient.Instead, the app grades heavily based on ranking and early prioritization, not just inclusion. In my case, I correctly identified the diagnosis, but because it was lower in my differential list, I received a score of 0/30.This creates two problems:1. Mismatch between user expectations and scoring system 2. False negative feedback, where correct reasoning is effectively scored as failure This is not a knowledge issue—it’s a communication issue.A brief onboarding or tutorial explaining:- That differentials must be ranked by likelihood - That earlier identification improves scoring - How hints affect grading would immediately resolve this.As it stands, the app risks losing users early—especially trainees—because it feels like being graded incorrectly rather than being taught. Receiving a near-zero score despite identifying the correct diagnosis is discouraging and undermines trust in the feedback.The tool has strong potential, but the lack of clear instructions actively detracts from the learning experience.If clear guidance is added upfront, I would strongly consider revising this to a 5/5, because the underlying product is genuinely valuable.
Excellent concept, but onboarding gap undermines learning
Apr 30

Resideo-007

I like the core idea of this app—case-based diagnostic reasoning is exactly what trainees need. However, there is a critical issue with how scoring is presented versus how users are instructed.There is no upfront explanation of how answers are graded. As a result, I initially approached cases by building a broad differential (which is a valid clinical strategy), assuming that having the correct diagnosis included would be sufficient.Instead, the app grades heavily based on ranking and early prioritization, not just inclusion. In my case, I correctly identified the diagnosis, but because it was lower in my differential list, I received a score of 0/30.This creates two problems:1. Mismatch between user expectations and scoring system 2. False negative feedback, where correct reasoning is effectively scored as failure This is not a knowledge issue—it’s a communication issue.A brief onboarding or tutorial explaining:- That differentials must be ranked by likelihood - That earlier identification improves scoring - How hints affect grading would immediately resolve this.As it stands, the app risks losing users early—especially trainees—because it feels like being graded incorrectly rather than being taught. Receiving a near-zero score despite identifying the correct diagnosis is discouraging and undermines trust in the feedback.The tool has strong potential, but the lack of clear instructions actively detracts from the learning experience.If clear guidance is added upfront, I would strongly consider revising this to a 5/5, because the underlying product is genuinely valuable.
Great application
11/13/2024

Dr. Christos
I find this application awesome. It features great cases. There is a learning component to it and the ability to collaborate with others. The teaching points make it an academic exercise and allow one to build on their foundation of knowledge. I think it would be a great resource in the educational, post graduate, and professional settings. There are also points someone can accumulate which makes it fun like a game, too
Great application
11/13/2024

Dr. Christos

I find this application awesome. It features great cases. There is a learning component to it and the ability to collaborate with others. The teaching points make it an academic exercise and allow one to build on their foundation of knowledge. I think it would be a great resource in the educational, post graduate, and professional settings. There are also points someone can accumulate which makes it fun like a game, too
Outstanding resource in bite sizes
12/26/2023

Marklovesgames
Inuse this to to teach my students how to develop and modify differential diagnoses. The way this makes you lay out your thinking before moving to the next part of data collection is invaluable for this. It then allows you to re-make your differential list when new information comes in. Feedback is immediate,accuracy ranked, and explanation is provided. If you (or your students) are competitive, they will love watching their scores increase! Also, CME. For free
Outstanding resource in bite sizes
12/26/2023

Marklovesgames

Inuse this to to teach my students how to develop and modify differential diagnoses. The way this makes you lay out your thinking before moving to the next part of data collection is invaluable for this. It then allows you to re-make your differential list when new information comes in. Feedback is immediate,accuracy ranked, and explanation is provided. If you (or your students) are competitive, they will love watching their scores increase! Also, CME. For free

The Human Dx app has been updated! Thanks to everyone who provided feedback on changes they'd like to see in the product - please keep sending us detailed feedback through the settings tab in the app or by visiting https://www.humandx.org/contact! We've been hard at work making improvements for v9+, including: - Minor bug fixes and usability improvements

Version 9.10.3 Apr 5

Data Linked to You

The following data may be collected and linked to your identity:
- Contact Info
- Contacts
- User Content
- Usage Data
Data Not Linked to You

The following data may be collected but it is not linked to your identity:
- Diagnostics

Privacy practices may vary, for example, based on the features you use or your age. Learn More

Accessibility

Information

Seller: Human Dx, Ltd.
Size: 76.6 MB
Category: Reference
Compatibility: Requires iOS 15.1 or later.

iPhone
Requires iOS 15.1 or later.

iPad
Requires iPadOS 15.1 or later.

iPod touch
Requires iOS 15.1 or later.

Mac
Requires macOS 12.0.0 or later and a Mac with Apple M1 chip or later.

Apple Vision
Requires visionOS 1.0 or later.
Languages: English
Age Rating: 16+

16+

Learn More

Frequent
Medical Treatment information

Contains
Messaging and Chat
User-Generated Content

Developer Website

Privacy Policy

Supports

Wallet

The simplest way to get all your passes in one place.

You Might Also Like

View

Thalamus

Education
View

The Chief Complaint

Emergency medicine guide
View

TrueLearn SmartBanks

Exam Prep to Test Your Best
View

Boards (ABIM & ABFM)

Education
View

Sketchy Learning

Learning made unforgettable
View

UWorld PA Prep

Education
View

Suture: Laceration Repair App

An easy-to-use reference
View

Rosh Review | Exam Prep Qbank

Education
View

EMRA Antibiotic Guide

Reference
View

Dr.Oracle AI Medical Assistant

Medical Guidelines & Research

Human Dx

Ratings & Reviews

Paramedic friendly!

Excellent concept, but onboarding gap undermines learning

Great application

Outstanding resource in bite sizes

What’s New

App Privacy

Data Linked to You

Data Not Linked to You

Accessibility

Information

Supports

Wallet

You Might Also Like

Thalamus

The Chief Complaint

TrueLearn SmartBanks

Boards (ABIM & ABFM)

Sketchy Learning

UWorld PA Prep

Suture: Laceration Repair App

Rosh Review | Exam Prep Qbank

EMRA Antibiotic Guide

Dr.Oracle AI Medical Assistant