µBrowser: Watch Web Browser 17+

Ubrowser works quite well seeing as the Apple Watch doesn’t have its own browser. There’s WebKit, but it’s got quite a few limitations. Ubrowser has limitations as wel, but I’ll discuss those soon. It’s not lightning fast like Safari on iPhone, but that isn’t that much of an issue. Websites are surprisingly scaled properly to the watch, so everything is readable and the buttons are large enough to press. Overall, it’s quite nice.

Now for the limitations, however. My main issue is that you cannot sign in on websites. I tried to go to Google chat and the sign in page repeatedly loaded and reloaded when I tried to sign in. Video playback also doesn’t work, although the browser recognizes a video. This isn’t a huge issue, but still a little annoying.

Should you buy it? Here’s my verdict, after a day of use: Yes, you should. It’s only $1 (for me), and for that dollar you get an almost fully-functional web browser (the only downsides being what I listed above). The companion app on your iPhone makes it easy to add bookmarks for sites you visit regularly. Duck-Duck-Go is not as fast, nor as smart as Google, but it still comes up with relevant results.

microBrowser obviously won't replace iOS Safari, and for me, honestly, it's more of a novelty than something I expect to seriously use very often, at this point.

That said, it works suprisingly well on many sites - especially on the larger screen AW Series 7. It's best for sites that don't require much interaction.

If your Watch has an internet connection via WiFi or Cellular, you don't need to have your iPhone with you to use microBrowser. This can be handy if you're jogging without your iPhone, or if you forgot to bring your iPhone with you.

Regarding my "novelty value" comment. That's how I felt about much of the Apple Watch functionality when I got my first Watch, a Series 3. I thought it was super cool to have essentially a tiny computer on my wrist that I could use to check my messages, see a few news headlines, get a quick overview of the weather, etc. But I never really relied on that early Watch, except for fitness tracking. But the Watch models of at least the past 2 years are far more capable, faster, and have bigger screens than the Series 3 - and they are far more useful in their own right.

I don't regret buying that Series 3, and I absolutely don't regret buying microBrowser for 99 cents. I've already had way more fun with it than with most 99 cent games I've purchased. And I do see myself using it occasionally to check some of my favorite websites when I'm on the go.

A great app , would be worth the couple of Pennie’s it costs , but missing one feature . I hope the developer to take some time , implement a previous page button.

My reasons
With Siri : I can open the web pages with Siri, navigate better , I don’t have to reopen the webpage again if need to go back but if you put your wrist down you have to do it all again which is time consuming. This is free.

With this app: I don’t have to worry about the pages getting closed if I put my wrist down , but if you need to access the previous page , I have to reopen the website again which is also time consuming. This is paid.

Please either implement a previous page button , or make sure web history includes every single pages we clicked or navigated on or off from. That we way can easily reopen the previous page.

Now, I don’t know how much time it would take or what kind of limitations you might have to deal with.

It will take this greatly designed app , yet mediocre
because of missing one single feature to the very best.

I’m asking you to do this because I really like the way you designed this app.

Thank you for creating the app , and in advance thanks for the upcoming feature.